Post Islam Muhammad

And those who disbelieve say: "the Koran is not only lie to the diada forged by Muhammad, and he is assisted by another nation", then they do have a ruthlessness and a big lie. (QS. Al-Furqan: 4)

Non-Muslims, and some misguided groups (such as JIL) said that Islam is the length of the Prophet Muhammad and shahabatnya. But if you asked them, where the evidence, they can not show any evidence that one can be accepted. Speech they do not only blank other studios. Speech they do not have a strong foothold basis.

Hence many of the basic show that Islam is a religion of revelation. And one of them is evidence of a decline of An-Nisa verse 176.

When Umar was asked about bin Khaththab KALALAH property (property that a person died without leaving children and father). Even Umar is a clever person. But yet he still does not dare make aqalnya opinion as syari'at. Hear the question that the Prophet Muhammad saaw not directly answer. When he was a prophet and messenger of God. Alight and then the paragraph that explains syari'at God KALALAH the property.

So obvious that the Islamic Prophet Muhammad is not the length saaw, and not the length of the shahabat. If it is true that Islam is the theme of Prophet Muhammad, why does not he just use his opinion aqal to determine the Sharia? If it is true that Islam is the length of the shahabat, why Khaththab bin Umar, a major shahabat, a successor to the Prophet Muhammad saaw lead humankind, not just use the opinion aqalnya to determine syari'at? This is a clear proof that Islam is the religion of revelation. The aqal only serves to dig revelation that contain syari'at guidance from the Creator Syari'at, Syari ', which is a loss.

So, do not correct Mu'tazilah opinion that the aqal course, someone can be safe in the world and the Hereafter. That is not true, because not only will aqal can determine how the religious right in muthlaq, aqal also not able to determine how to manage life with the correct muthlaq. Aqal not have the capacity for it. Namuin so aqal indeed have the ability to explore and understand the desire Syari '(God), which is in His Word. To determine the law, aqal used to excavate Nash. I The Prophet is one of the sources, but remember that the Prophet said and did not do except with the guidance of revelation. So it is not the Prophet have the authority to make the Sharia. Prophet only say and do according to what is revealed to him. The only explanation of the revelation. So once again, Islam is not the length of Prophet Muhammad saaw. Not true what people said it astray.

Then people astray as JIL also stated that the science of fiqh prepared priests madzhab is Arabisme. This is deceitful accusations from people who want to keep people from the Islamic apply Islamic right. They want to apply Islamic that they perceive as Arabisme. If you have lost the Islamic Sharia, the law is the law and then used a liberal freedom of the animal. JIL is now proven that Islam does not teach the truth. They only want Liberalisme, an essay understand people astray.

Then how about the Christians who claim that Islam is the theme Muhammad? Ask them, the religion of their anut now this essay whom? I say that the religion of their anut essay is human. And I will give you a proof. Because one is enough evidence for the pure beraqal.

In letters made Paul in the Bible stated that the Companies / circumcision for men is not an obligation. Even as Abraham and Jesus Companies, as well as the Prophet and the followers of them. Who is he to cancel the law? Allahkah? Not, but the man named Paul.

When a defect is contained in a book of which is considered holy, the sanctity gugurlah it. Obvious, that the Christian religion is not a revelation, but the religious composition of Paul, a false prophet. As the Liberal Islam is the flow of misguided opus Ulil Abshar Abdalla, who also behave as a false prophet Paul.